early childhood menu left
early childhood menu right
early childhood news logo

Visit these sites!

Love Your Teeth

kidsperks

Parenting_Tips_DrSally.jpg

Reliable_Bloggers

mommyperks_125

Geography determines giftedness? PDF Print E-mail

 

 Submitted by Sixty Second Parent

In 2008-2009 the State of the States report identified a gap in support for our gifted and talented students.  In a society where colossal amounts of funding are given toward the development of our gifted athletes, it is shocking to see the neglect of our academically gifted continue.  The lack of commitment to our gifted and talented students will “leave our nation ill-prepared to field the next generation of innovators and to compete in the global economy.”  Two cents of every $100 federal dollars goes toward support of gifted in K-12 education. 

Many states provide funding for gifted at the state level; however twenty-six percent of states provide no funding for gifted education.  Now with more budget cuts pending, even states with financial support for gifted programs are potentially going to see a decrease in funding.  Your child’s gifted education is based on your geographic location.  It shouldn’t be.  

As a teacher in a gifted program, I can only provide parents with the information for the state regulations that determine the “gifted” for my district.  It is baffling to many parents how their child was “gifted” in State A—but is not “gifted” now that they live in State B.  We once had a child deemed “highly gifted” in our district and served in a separate center for these students who moved one state over only to discover he did not even qualify in that state in the basic “gifted” program.  Parents are confused with good reason!

Most “gifted” students spend the majority of their class time in a regular education class.  Thirty-six states require no training in the nature and needs of the gifted child for regular education teachers.  Meeting the needs of a diverse group of students is challenging for the classroom teacher.  However, many teachers often survive by teaching to the middle and finding ways to help those most in need.  It is our gifted and talented population who are being most neglected.  Teachers trying to manage a heterogeneous group of students may use the gifted students as teacher aids.  These students help teach their classmates when they finish an assignment early.  Gifted students should not be teacher aids.  Gifted students deserve to be taught new information!  Many times these gifted students become the students who run errands for the teacher.  Can anyone justify using our most academically talented as the school “runner”?

There is a huge need for a national gifted education policy.  It needs to be comprehensive and include accountability.  Gifted students deserve to be taught.  Local, state, and federal officials need to combine efforts to make sure our gifted and talented students are served by teachers who are prepared to meet their academic needs.  Meeting the needs of these students in our educational system now will surely serve as a profitable choice for our nation’s future!

Source: National Association for Gifted Children

ABOUT the Author:
 

Kristie presently teaches in two elementary schools in a Gifted Program referred to as "Challenge" - working with third through fifth graders – she is also the mother of two “gifted” children.

 

Comments  

 
# Allison 2010-05-21 16:48
This is so interesting that it's still happening, and when I say interesting I mean sad.

My sister and I were in a total of schools in 24 months and in each we were evaluated differently. In one I was in the top reading group and there was talk about skipping my sister up a grade , in another they were evaluating me for learning disabilities.

There needs to be more cohesive standards, and funding. It's incredibly hard on students to move schools, let alone have their confidence shaken by not being ' As smart" as they thought they were when they no longer qualify for the program.

This doesn't even touch on the amount of testing teachers have to administer , time it takes for that and the time it takes to explain to parents when a child doesn't qualify. With a more standard policy perhaps some of that time could be spent doing something incredible with the students.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Guest 2010-05-21 19:51
You make some good points, Allie. Thank you for sharing. My own son was put through testing at two different schools, however, both schools were in the same state and rendered like-results.

I think a more standard policy would be a great idea for all states. I long for a day when schools have funding for every need and every child :-) I'd also love to see us teaching to the individual child more, too...rather than a "group." Montessori does a wonderful job of that already, of course.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
# Guest 2010-05-26 16:30
I agree it is sad that it is still happening. All children with additional needs are challenged by this. They qualify for help in some areas and not in others. Awful to have to think about moving just so your child could get a good, supportive education. I agree with Shara, that ultimately it would be best if children were taught as individuals
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh



Early Childhood News and Resources is designed and maintained by Design Media Pros | DMpros logo